Public Participation and the Kenyan Finance Act: A New Precedent

The Supreme Court of Kenya recently delivered a landmark judgment regarding the Finance Act, 2023, a case that grappled with the core tenets of public participation in the legislative process. This ruling provides crucial guidance on the requirements for public input, particularly concerning finance bills, and sets a significant precedent for future lawmaking in Kenya.

At the heart of the dispute was the question of whether the Finance Act was constitutionally enacted, with a particular focus on the adequacy of public participation. The Court meticulously examined the process, acknowledging the need for both meaningful public input and the practical realities of lawmaking, especially the tight timelines associated with finance bills.

A key takeaway from the judgment is the Court's affirmation that the initial public participation process for the Finance Bill was indeed sufficient. However, the most impactful aspect of the ruling lies in the Court's stance on amendments introduced after this initial phase. The Court unequivocally stated that even if substantial amendments are made, there is no need for a fresh round of public participation, provided these amendments directly address concerns raised in the initial public input. This decision effectively streamlines the legislative process for finance bills, balancing the need for public participation with the urgency often associated with such legislation.

Furthermore, the Court addressed the issue of Parliament's obligation to provide reasons for accepting or rejecting public views. While it acknowledged the absence of an explicit legal requirement for detailed explanations on every view, it emphasized the importance of reasonable measures to ensure transparency and accountability. The Court found that the National Assembly's report on the Finance Bill adequately fulfilled this obligation.

This judgment underscores the Supreme Court's commitment to ensuring meaningful public participation in the legislative process. It clarifies the expectations for public input, particularly in the context of finance bills, and strikes a balance between the need for public participation and the practical constraints of lawmaking. This decision sets a clear precedent for future legislative processes in Kenya, emphasizing the importance of transparency, accountability, and responsiveness to public concerns in shaping the nation's laws.

The contents do not constitute legal advice, are not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Contact us for legal advice or other professional advice in relation to any particular matters you or your organisation may have.